The Problem With Dashboards

Dashboards are seductive.

There is always another metric to add, another card to design, another clever visualization to include.

But a dashboard can become less useful as it becomes more complete.

The hard part is deciding what not to show.

For OpsClock and similar projects, the question is not "What data can I display?" The better question is "What information would I actually glance at and use?"

Similar Posts

  • Scarlco Events Build Note

    Scarlco Events is a generalized event information and schedule display concept. The interesting challenge is not simply putting events on a screen. The challenge is making the display reliable, readable, and appropriate for the environment where it runs. A browser on a desktop computer is forgiving. A signage endpoint may not be. That difference changes…

  • What I Want From Codex

    Codex is most useful when I treat it like a capable collaborator, not a vending machine. The better I describe the project constraints, the better the results become. The more I preserve context in READMEs, checklists, and changelogs, the less likely future work is to drift. The pattern is becoming clear: ChatGPT helps shape the…

  • Respecting Boundaries While Writing About Work

    Writing about technical work requires boundaries. The most interesting stories are often close to real systems, real people, and real organizations. That does not mean every detail belongs on a public website. For this site, the goal is to write about lessons, patterns, and ideas without exposing private workflows, current-employer details, client information, or anything…

  • The Story Behind Scarlco

    "Scarl" came before Scarlco. In production environments, names get shortened quickly. There may be multiple Steves on headset, multiple people with similar names on a schedule, and not much patience for ambiguity when a cue is coming up. My name often appeared as S. Carl. Over time, that became Scarl. Later, when I wanted a…

  • Scarlco Menu Build Note

    Scarlco Menu is a reminder that content tools need two interfaces. There is the public display: clean, readable, and attractive. Then there is the editor: practical, understandable, and forgiving for the people who must maintain the content. It is easy to focus on the display because that is what everyone sees. But the editor determines…